What Is a Bail-In?
A bail-in provides relief to a financial institution on the brink of failure by requiring the cancellation of debts owed to creditors and depositors. A bail-in is the opposite of a bailoutwhich involves the rescue of a financial institution by external parties, typically governments, using taxpayers’ money for funding.
Bailouts help to prevent creditors from taking on losses while bail-ins mandate creditors to take losses.
- A bail-in helps a financial institution on the brink of failure by requiring the cancellation of debts owed to creditors and depositors.
- Bail-ins and bailouts are both resolution schemes used in distressed situations.
- Bailouts help to keep creditors from losses while bail-ins mandate that creditors take losses.
- Bail-ins have been considered across the globe to help mitigate the burden on taxpayers as a result of bank bailouts.
Bail-ins and bailouts arise out of necessity rather than choice. Both offer options for helping institutions in a crisis. Bailouts were a powerful tool in the 2008 Financial Crisis, but bail-ins have their place as well.
Investors and deposit-holders in a troubled financial institution would prefer to keep the organization solvent rather than face the alternative of losing the full value of their investments or deposits in a crisis. Governments also would prefer not to let a financial institution fail because large-scale bankruptcy could increase the likelihood of systemic problems for the market. These risks are why bailouts were used in the 2008 Financial Crisis, and the concept of “too big to fail” led to widespread reform.
Requirements for a Bail-In
While most investors are familiar with bailouts and their uses, bail-ins are also a stratagem of economists. Europe has incorporated them to solve many of its greatest challenges. The Bank of International Settlement (BIS) has also spoken openly about how bail-ins can be used with a focus on integrations in the European Union. In these scenarios, bail-ins can be used in cases wherein a full government bailout is unlikely.
Typically, bail-ins are instituted for one of three reasons:
- A financial institution’s collapse is not likely to create a systemic problem and lacks “too big to fail” consequences.
- The government does not possess the financial resources necessary for a bailout.
- The resolution framework requires that a bail-in be used to mitigate the number of taxpayers’ funds allocated.
Depositors in the U.S. are protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which insures each bank account for up to $250,000. In a bail-in scenario, financial institutions would only use the amount of deposits that are in excess of a customer’s 250,000 balance.
Real-World Examples of Bail-In
Cyprus and European Union resolutions provide two examples of bail-ins in action.
The Cyprus Experiment
While the public became familiar with the subject of bailouts in the aftermath of the Great Recession of 2008, bail-ins attracted attention in 2013 after government officials resorted to the strategy in Cyprus. As discussed in The National Herald, the consequences were that uninsured depositors (defined in the European Union as people with deposits larger than 100,000 euros) in the Bank of Cyprus lost a substantial portion of their deposits.
In return, the depositors received bank stock. However, the value of these stocks did not equate to most depositors’ losses.
In 2018, the European Union began looking at more broadly incorporating bail-ins into its resolution framework. In a speech at the IADI-ERC International ConferenceFernando Restoy from the Bank for International Settlements discussed the bail-in plans. In the European Union, a new resolution framework is being considered that would potentially incorporate both bail-ins and bailouts. Bail-ins would be involved in the first phase of a resolution, requiring a specified amount of funds to be written off before bailout funds would become available.